Scritto da: laprof71 28/05/2007 0.04
mio padre non è convinto che movimento della testa di k indietro/ sinistra sia compatibile con uno sparo da dietro..
Prendiamo atto delle convinzioni di suo padre,ma dobbiamo dirle che si sbaglia
The key point here is that this complex rearward movement is not compatible with a direct hit of a bullet from the right front. The head does not snap backward rapidly the way it snapped forward, even though it was perfectly free to do so. Rather the head starts moving backward slowly and gains momentum over several frames. There is no cloud of brain matter to the rear as there was to the front. There is no damage to the left hemisphere of his brain, as there would have to be with a hit from the right. There is no cone of tiny fragments going from right to left in the brain, and no exit wound on the left side. No, the rearward motion was of JFK's entire upper torso, with the head just moving along with the neck. It is a vicious recoil of sorts from the exploding right side of his head. Such a movement could have been caused by a mechanical recoil from the particles that exploded frontward out of his head (the so-called "jet effect"), by some sort of neurological reaction (sometimes called a "neuromuscular spasm"), or a combination of both. The available data strongly suggest that it was indeed a combination of effects, whose detailed contributions will probably never be known with certainty.
Si veda anche:
http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100shot5.html.
potrebbe dirmi chi ha compiuto la stessa impresa di osw, durante le ricostruzioni dell'attentato? cioè qualche esperto tiratore ha imbracciato lo stesso fucile di osw, allo stesso piano del deposito e ha colpito una macchina alla stessa andatura?
L'"impresa" di Oswald è stata replicata.carmelo pugliatti