Scritto da: Diego Verdegiglio 01/12/2003 12.25
Egregio Signor Maiucchi,
io La invito nuovamente a leggere ciò che ho scritto, ma non sia così arrogante: crede forse di voler dimostrare che io non abbia argomenti solo perché Lei ha approfondito più di me ZR Rifle? DV
ZR Rifle con Cuba non c'entra...
Ho da parte il documento che segue, ma l'originale e' stato rimosso dal web... Ho altro materiale su ZR, piu' approfondito, ma non voglio appesantire il post. Se volete lo mando in pvt...
3. THE ZR/RIFLE PROGRAM OF THE CIA
In 1975, the US Senate held hearings on assassination plots sponsored by the US Government and issued its report titled Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders. In that report, we learned of the CIA's assassination projects code-named ZR/RIFLE. We also learned of two members of this special assassination team code-named QJ/WIN and WI/ROGUE. To date,
their true identities have not been made public. Apparently, their names were not provided to the Senate Intelligence Committee either during these hearings. The CIA did give some descriptions to the committee, however, that may provide us with some clues as to their identities. However, I believe the checks and balances concept of our Constitution have taken
considerable abuse from the Intelligence portion of the Executive branch of our government. They have many times outright misled Congress. We are left with wondering just what is true, what is fiction and/or cover story.
In the case of the identity of these two ZR/RIFLE agents, we have learned the following: QJ/WIN was "a foreign citizen with a criminal background, recruited in Europe." WI/ROGUE was "a forger and former bank robber [who] learns quickly and carries out any assignment without regard for danger."
In the book, The Man Who Knew too Much, the author states, "The agency [CIA] admits that its own handlers of WIN and ROGUE were afraid of them, that they were not following CIA directives and were off on assassination plots of their own (emphasis added). The CIA was trying to keep them on a leash, because it was afraid to cut them off." Unfortunately, when citizens try to
understand intelligence agencies and methods, we do not have the authority of Congress to call the activities of these people into question. We have to take what Congress allows to be published. However, if we try to read between the lines of the session where these descriptions were given (i.e. assume the CIA was still trying to further muddy the waters by giving only
partial truthful information to prevent anyone from ever determining the identity of these individuals), we see that 2/3 of the description of WIN matches James Earl Ray, namely, "a foreign citizen with a criminal background, recruited in Europe."
James certainly had a "criminal" background. He was stationed in the US Army in Germany as a Military Policeman for the first two years of his enlistment. He was then "transferred" to the infantry. He reported to William Bradford Huie in a series of interviews that appeared in Look magazine that he liked being an MP, but he did not like the infantry. So, (Ray claimed) he decided, "to buck for a bad conduct discharge," which succeeded and he was discharged. If he was recruited into intelligence at
the point of transfer into the infantry, his time in the infantry was probably used for training. His "cover" for his permanent use in intelligence then became needed, and he began his "life in crime" in the Army, supposedly being put into hard labor for three months for drunkenness and resisting arrest. After his official discharge, he then became available for intelligence service without anyone in the Army knowing of his
new duties. This "cover" of crime continued in the states as previously reviewed.
If James indeed was QJ/WIN from ZR/RIFLE, then his "duties" would have been assassinations. But it is reasonable to assume he could have personally known and worked with WI/ROGUE. I believe WI/ROGUE could have been one Raymond Curtis. During the manhunt for Ray, and within four days of Ray being identified by the FBI as the actual person wanted in the assassination, Curtis (awaiting an appeal on a murder charge in Georgia) was interviewed by an unnamed AP reporter whose story appeared in both the St. Louis Post Dispatch and the Kansas City Times (probably others that I just did not catch). Curtis made some interesting statements that when coupled with my suspicions about James' real life, further fueled additional suspicion.
Ray and Curtis seemed to frequent the same penal institutions. They shared a cell in Jackson County jail in Kansas City, Missouri in 1955 for seven months. Ray was then transferred to the Leavenworth federal prison, then followed in two weeks by Curtis. They occupied the same cell building and then adjoining cells. Curtis was then transferred to a prison in Atlanta
and did not see Ray again until late 1961 or early 1962 when Curtis was put in the Missouri State Penitentiary for 10 years for armed robbery. During their stay in the Missouri state facility, they saw each other almost daily.
Yet for their time together in these facilities, it is never documented once (that I have located) that they participated in criminal activities together.
Curtis made a point of telling the reporter that both he and Ray were in the prison when the news of President Kennedy's assassination was received at the prison. Curtis said Ray was referring to the president's assassination when he said, "Boy, probably somebody made a nice little penny off of that. I sure wish it was me." Curtis also stated that they learned together a few days after the president's assassination from a new man in
the prison that there was a one million dollar bounty on Dr. King. Curtis claims Ray smiled and said, "Well, if there's $1,000,000 out on King, I believe if I ever get out I'll collect it."
My suspicions about this exchange are: 1) if Curtis was ROGUE, he was either instructed to make statements to the press (to assist in implicating Ray to keep him on a permanent "leash" as the CIA desired), or was providing further alibis for James to cover both of their involvements in other activities; 2) if he felt intimidated by the identification and/or apparent frame-up or betrayal of WIN, he may have been rushing to do damage control
on his own behalf.
If Ray and Curtis were members of ZR/RIFLE then their handlers at the CIA were "afraid" of them to the point they had to somehow bring them under control. This may explain why the evidence in the assassination of Dr. King used to implicate Ray was "dropped" in the manner it was, purposely put there to implicate him in the assassination. This could have been performed by "regular" CIA (meaning a CIA employee who followed official directives and orders, unlike WIN and ROGUE who were off apparently doing their own thing with their talents) trying to bring down the lead assassin of rogue elements within the American Intelligence Community. This would also partially explain the government's attempts to deny Ray his trial. If Ray
had been any other prisoner, he likely would have received his trial at the death of his first Tennessee judge in the original proceedings where Ray's plea arrangement was accepted. As it was, the US Government wanted Ray held by any means, probably in the interest of "national security." This may also explain the extreme measures taken to break Ray during his early incarcerations for the assassination (continual bright lights, personal guards, etc.).
In the case of Curtis, the murder charge he was being held on could conceivably have been arranged as a means for him to be "leashed" as well. I tried to discover his whereabouts but he is apparently deceased, having died some time after being released from prison.
4. JAMES EARL RAY AND THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY
The following summary is from evidence that I was initially researching and investigating which led to the above conclusions about James Earl Ray. Many researchers have believed for years that there was obvious "intelligence" overtones to the assassination of President Kennedy. This automatically makes "official evidence," suspicious; coincidences, important to the success of the operation to remain nothing but "coincidences;" truth, bad for the nation and our national security. Any evidence of true significance is somehow officially minimized, lost, stolen, misplaced, improperly handled
or otherwise made of no significance (all being intelligence methods).
I examined one "coincidence" that has (to me) led to a type of blue print of the assassination. The issue is the three "tramps" that were removed from a train in Dealey Plaza a short time after the assassination. For years, the public and research community were told there were no arrest records for
these individuals. In 1992, the City of Dallas made public their records on the assassination of President Kennedy. In the records were the arrest reports of these three individuals. One of those arrested had died between 1963 and 1992, but the other two were alive. I basically believe the stories that these two men gave to news media about that day. Additionally, I discussed the story with a relative of one of the men and discovered that all three were arrested the night before the assassination (by the Dallas police) and taken to a type of shelter where they were assisted with their needs. Apparently, this is where their grooming took place (accounting for their clean appearance instead of looking like hobos who had spent days
"riding the rails").
The "coincidence" we are asked to believe is that these men "looked" like other individuals who have come into notoriety over the years in other matters. One man had a strong resemblance to E. Howard Hunt of Watergate fame. Another man looked like Charles Harrelson, father of actor Woody Harrelson, a professional hit man imprisoned for murdering a federal judge
for hire (researchers made the connection of Harrelson to the assassination due to Harrelson's own "confession" about his involvement when he was trapped by police for the murder of the judge; he was under the influence of drugs at the time of his arrest which may account for his lack of silence).
The third person strongly resembled James Earl Ray. While many persons have thought that tramp looked just like Ray, since Ray was in the "custody" of the Missouri prison system, as far as I have learned, no one has seriously considered him suspect in any way with the assassination of President Kennedy.
Additionally, I believe the actual role of Lee Harvey Oswald was two-fold that day; 1.) look-alike impostor for another individual actively involved in the assassination, and 2.) patsy.
Since there have just been too many "coincidences" in the assassination, I was not satisfied that these individuals just happened to be there in the plaza. There had to be reasons they were there. In my research, I discovered that the use of look-alike individuals is termed "impostors" by the American Intelligence Community and the use of these types of
individuals is an actual intelligence method. Typically, such individuals are located by persons specialized in anthropology and who are able to pick out pictures of persons active in the military, or that served at some previous time, that strongly resemble the operative(s) for whom the impostor is to be used to impersonate. In a totally chance meeting with a retired
military/CIA individual whom I did not know, when I quizzed him about look-alikes and how they were recruited by the CIA, and without revealing why I was interested, he positively and entirely on his own associated the use of these impostors with assassinations.
Basically, the use of these look-alike impostors would have been to insure the actual persons involved in the assassination, if seen by the public, would have alibis establishing their presence elsewhere at the time of the assassination, and probably would have provided cover for the following persons:
1. E. Howard Hunt was an employee of the CIA in 1963 and specialized in propaganda (among other duties). There was a Mr. Hunt that Lee Oswald wrote to in early November, 1963 requesting additional information before anyone took any actions. There were two civil trials in a case that Hunt brought against a publication that asserted that Hunt was in Dallas the day of the
assassination (fueled by a reported document discovered in the CIA that expressed concerns about it potentially being discovered that Hunt was in Dallas on 11/22/63). Hunt lost the case, possibly primarily because even his children questioned his own involvement in the assassination as his alibi for that day included spending much of the day with them (Hunt never
called his grown children to testify on his behalf even though the case was going very badly for him). Attorney Mark Lane successfully represented the defendants. The jury believed Hunt was in Dallas that day and, therefore, no claim of libel or slander was found against the defendants. Nixon was concerned upon hearing that Hunt was involved in Watergate. While referring to Hunt, Nixon said, "...that will uncover a lot of things. You open that scab there's a hell of a lot of things and that we just feel it would be very detrimental to have this thing to go any further. This involves these Cubans, Hunt, and a lot of hanky-panky that we have nothing to do with ourselves." I believe Hunt was a primary planner of the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. Charles Harrelson had mob connections; one story had him using his participation in the Kennedy assassination as a reference for other work. Many researchers have believed in organized crime ties to the assassination.
Mr. Harrelson may have been their representative that day. Even he admits the amazing similarities between himself and the tramp (the existence of look-alike impostors would have probably been kept a secret from those involved in firing the actual shots, i.e. typical military "need-to-know" basis).
3. James Earl Ray was an American Intelligence operative who specialized in assassinations. He possibly worked for individuals within the CIA who were off doing their "own thing" but utilizing CIA resources for carrying out their respective plans. James may have been the victim of being used by both these renegade agents and traditional CIA. His exposure of involvement in the killing of Dr. King may have been at the behest of the traditional CIA to stop the activities of the renegades. The renegades had an additional "project" upon which they were working (the assassination of Bobby Kennedy) with which James was probably familiar. This may account for his capture occurring on the day of Bobby Kennedy's funeral and why he left a safe area of the airport in London to the area in which he was seized (he was probably instructed to do so). James' opportunity to participate in the Kennedy assassination was probably provided by a "disappearance" from the Missouri state prison (he was known as the prison hide-out artist), or by a temporary release to another "official" agency.
4. Mr. M (I am concealing the name of this individual on my Web pages; please refer to The Man Who Knew Too Much for his identification) was an anti-Castro Cuban living in Dallas. He was being investigated by the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Treasury Department just prior to the assassination (and arrested on charges). The investigating agent
approved Mr. M to be released on bond just a few days before the
assassination. Just after the assassination, the ATF agent was summoned to the homicide bureau for his assistance on the alleged murder rifle of the president. When he saw Oswald, he was greatly stunned that he looked exactly like Mr. M, so much so in fact that he thought he could have prevented the assassination if he had just not given approval on the bond
request days before. (Also interesting is that E. Howard Hunt kept close ties with anti-Castro Cubans from his days of working with them to free Cuba [he utilized some of his Cuban friends in Watergate]).
In order to discover exactly what the purpose(s) of the impostors would have been, I found myself faced with trying to plan and execute the assassination myself. Looking back on that process, I find it personally disturbing that I could do such a thing (inclinations to be involved in such things is not at all within my nature). I was later able to confirm the scenario I developed in an interview with a former Green Beret who had
knowledge of paramilitary methods. This individual confirmed what I believed to be the goals of this intelligence method, as follows:
1.) Had anyone in the public seen any of these persons actually [fire at the president], they would have picked a look-alike impostor out of a police line-up. Since the story of the witness would have been discredited by lack of evidence and presence of an alibi for the impostor, the conspirators would have escaped and covered their tracks.
2.) If a patsy was needed, witnesses and/or evidence could be arranged to implicate one of the look-alike impostors. The one needed as patsy would be physically in a position to be easily apprehended and charged.
Here are the photo comparisons that I made between James Earl Ray and one of the tramps from the Kennedy assassination. As you look at them, please remember several things: 1) the pictures used in the comparisons of the subjects were taken between 26 and about 54 months apart and the would have looked more like each other in grooming and dress the day of the assassination; 2) imagine yourself as the witness and that you saw Ray fire
a rifle at the president and only caught a fleeting glance at his face; could you have picked the tramp out of the line-up by mistake?
3) Ray escaped from prison in early 1967, about the time these pictures became known to researchers and were poised to become public. It appears he ceased to use prison as his "cover" from that time on.
Weighing these evidences and intelligence methods have given me the following insights into the assassination: The participation of the various organizations represented in the assassination of the president, namely organized crime, anti-Castro Cubans and the American Intelligence Community is no accident. Even the US military played key roles both before and after the assassination. Evidence linking all these organizations have surfaced over the years causing the average American citizen to throw up his hands in disbelief that so many people would be involved in such an operation. This is an intelligence "propaganda" method, designed to conceal the truth from even the most committed criminal investigators and independent researchers, persons who can not be called off of the search for "national security reasons" or have their actions otherwise controlled by the Executive branch of our government.
But to insure a successful operation, the intelligence community had their trained assassin located in the best possible place and probably the "last chance" location as well: the area near the triple underpass which became known as the grassy knoll. This shooter had to have been the intelligence
operative; those responsible overall for the assassination would not have left such an important position (and one so out in the open and near the public) to untrained individuals or shooters of questionable expertise. The anti-Castro Cuban shooter was in the School Book Depository (Oswald being impostor for that shooter and himself located within the Depository building
to serve as patsy). The organized crime shooter was in a different, unknown position but probably in close proximity to the other shooters.
Since Bobby Kennedy was the US Attorney General, special provisions had to be made to ensure his assistance in "covering-up" the truth of the assassination. Not knowing its true purpose, he approved a program designed to control such things as the autopsy, evidence and information in the event of the assassination of a US leader just a few months before his brother was killed. This is just one example of the lengths this cabal of people will go to accomplish their deeds, even fooling the very best in our society. It is also an indication of the extent of their planning; nothing is ever done half-way or in a rush without adequate planning and preparation. If Oswald
was selected as a look-alike impostor/patsy for this operation, then the planning for this assassination may have begun long before anyone, that I know of, has ever speculated before.
While concealing the absolute truth may not be an easy task for these people, they have successfully had operations in place to keep the justice department and other agencies from diving too far in to these mysteries for over 30 years. The actual truth would expose too many levels of high power in the world, possibly including at least one US president. It would expose
the runaway CIA and how their tax supported resources are used by this cabal of people to keep control of the US population and the world. It would expose how (when they are unable to handle persons who are able to muster the support of the masses in exposing their deeds) they resort to murder to silence opposition.