Stellar Blade Un'esclusiva PS5 che sta facendo discutere per l'eccessiva bellezza della protagonista. Vieni a parlarne su Award & Oscar!

Il Forum di johnkennedy.it Il forum sull'assassinio di John Fitzgerald Kennedy

Un sito complottista

  • Messaggi
  • OFFLINE
    carmelo pugliatti
    Post: 119
    Registrato il: 17/12/2002
    Frequentatore
    00 31/05/2007 02:52

    Scritto da: laprof71 31/05/2007 0.32
    se non sbaglio, mi sembra, che la qualifica di tiratore scelto sia nei marine una valutazione media, e mi riviene in mente l'opinione di nelson delgado: oswald :a poor shot.


    E' uno dei tanti luoghi comuni sul caso.Un tiratore "medio" secondo gli altissimi standard valutativi del corpo dei Marines è in realtà un eccellente tiratore.E tale era Oswald col fucile.
    carmelo pugliatti
  • OFFLINE
    Demonfly
    Post: 309
    Registrato il: 21/08/2003
    Frequentatore
    00 21/06/2007 17:15
    Re:

    Scritto da: Diego Verdegiglio 29/05/2007 19.23
    Pensar male si può, caro Alessandro: solo che non si va da nessuna parte. E' solo un sospetto senza fondamento buttato lì. A quali verbali e interrogatori si riferisce? Qual è la fonte che Lei cita? Spero che non siano persone del tipo Garrison, Marrs & Co., le cui idee non condivido.



    Misi il link qui in un altro thread... non ricordo le vs risposte dell'epoca.
    Saluti
  • OFFLINE
    Diego Verdegiglio
    Post: 1.277
    Registrato il: 18/11/2002
    Veterano
    00 21/06/2007 18:51
    Non le ricordo neanche io. DV
    Diego Verdegiglio
  • OFFLINE
    !presidente!
    Post: 421
    Registrato il: 27/05/2005
    Veterano
    00 24/07/2007 19:00
    GUY BANISTER e OSWALD
    Nello stesso sito del Sig. Sabatino, si parla dei rapporti tra Banister e Oswald, considerando che Jim Garrison, nella sua inchiesta, aveva ritrovato i fogli di Oswald "Hands off Cuba" tra le carte del defunto detective privato (Banister stesso). Il fatto che abbia questi fogli Banister, può esser dovuto al suo "sequestro" a Oswald dopo che il detective ex FBI abbia saputo che Oswald utilizzasse il suo indirizzo come sede del comitato per la lealtà vs Cuba. Ciò non vuol dire, però che ci fosse un accordo tra i due, per organizzare un attentao a JFK. Ho già sostenuto in un altra discussione che L'operazione "Mangusta", cioè la guerra permanente vs Castro, è un episodio collaterale rispetto ai fatti di Dallas. Anche se i vari Oswald, Ferrie, Banister ecc. avessero partecipato all'operazione stessa, nn vuol dire necessariamente che stessero organizzando anche l'omicidio Kennedy...come si fanno a "collegare" i 2 eventi? cosa c'entrano uno con l'altro? l'errore è clamoroso, e lo ha commesso Jim Garrison...

    [Modificato da !presidente! 24/07/2007 19.01]

  • OFFLINE
    Diego Verdegiglio
    Post: 1.321
    Registrato il: 18/11/2002
    Veterano
    00 25/07/2007 03:46
    Mi state dicendo che Garrison trovò i manifestini di Oswald nell'ufficio di Guy Banister? Lo dice solo lui o ci sono fonti certe (dato che non ritengo lui una fonte certa)?
    Diego Verdegiglio
  • OFFLINE
    !presidente!
    Post: 422
    Registrato il: 27/05/2005
    Veterano
    00 27/07/2007 19:01
    No, il discorso è più "largo", Sig. Verdegiglio. Se anche ciò che sostiene Garrison è la verità, (cioè che Banister e Oswald fossero collegati) e, magari, venissero provati rapporti "stretti" tra i 2 nell'operazione Mangusta, non vedo cosa c'entri questo con la preparazione dell'attentato a Dallas. Siamo nel campo delle pure ipotesi, d'accordo, ma nn mi convincerebbero a credere ad un complotto partendo da New Orleans e dai manifestini filo-cubani. L'operazione Mangusta, indipendentemente dalla partecipazione o meno di Oswald, Banister, Ferrie ecc. nn può esser collegata con Dallas, xchè alla luce delle prove apparse anche nel sito del Sig. Ferrero, la morte di Jfk è imputabile a Oswald...
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 12
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 27/07/2007 20:40
    Se non tra Oswald e Banister, l'HSCA riuscì a dimostrare i rapporti tra Oswald, Ferrie e Shaw. Diversi credibili testimoni di Clinton e Jackson, due piccole cittadine della Lousiana, dichiararono di aver visto i tre in una Cadillac nera. Lo sceriffo di Clinton, John Manchester, testimoniando al cospetto del Select Committee, dichiarò di essersi avvicinato alla Cadillac, e di aver chiesto al conducente di identificarsi. Quest'ultimo, mostrando la patente di guida, si rivelò essere Clay (Bertrand) Shaw.
    ____________________

    HSCA Counsel: The driver of the car identified himself, did he not, sir?

    Manchester: Yes, sir, he did.

    HSCA Counsel: What name did he give you?

    Manchester: He gave Clay Shaw, which corresponded with his driver's license. (HSCA document #008503)
    __________________________________________

    Saluti

    Andrea
  • OFFLINE
    Diego Verdegiglio
    Post: 1.328
    Registrato il: 18/11/2002
    Veterano
    00 28/07/2007 01:21
    Dalla deposizione di John Manchester per il processo a Clay Shaw:
    STATE OF LOUISIANA-PARISH OF ORLEANS-AFFIDAVIT
    BEFORE ME, personally came and appeared JOHN MANCHESTER
    Town Marshall Clinton, Louisiana, May 1967

    Who, after being duly sworn, deposed and said:

    During the time of the Civil Rights [sic] demonstrations, I can remember that my attention was called to a Cadillac that was parked close to the Voter Registrar's Office. I DON'T REMEMBER exactly how my attention was called to the car, and I don't remember exactly where it was parked, but it was in the vicinity of the Registrar's office. I DON'T REMEMBER exactly how, but I remember finding out some way the car was from the International Trade Mart in New Orleans. It is possible that I could have checked it out through our Sheriff's office or I may have gone up and talked to the people in the car and got the information from them. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO REMEMBER EXACTLY HOW. I do remember mentioning to someone, but I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHO, that the Cadillac was from the International Trade Mart in New Orleans. I also remember the joke being said that they were selling bananas, but I DON'T KNOW whether I said it or someone else said it. There was always a bunch of people around and I DON'T KNOW who could have been around at the time. There were always people coming and going and stopping and talking and looking. I can remember there were two people in the car and both were in the front seat. The one on the driver's side was well dressed with a white shirt and tie. He was neat. The main thing I remember about the man was that he had gray hair. It was a good bit of hair and it wasn't thin. He did not have a hat on. He looked tall and well built from what I could tell from seeing him in the car. Possibly 6 feet or better. I DON'T REMEMBER much about his complexion. I would say that FROM PICTURES I HAVE SEEN IN THE PAPER of CLAY SHAW that he RESEMBLED CLAY SHAW quite a bit. I would say this mostly from his build and his hair. They are the main things I remember about him. I feel that I must have walked up to the car and talked to the man on the driver's side, but I CANìT BE SURE and I REALLY CAN'T BE CERTAIN. I feel that Henry Earl Palmer must have told me to check it out, and I must have walked up to the car and talked to the man and he told me that he was from the International Trade Mart in New Orleans, BUT I CAN'T BE SURE. I DON'T BELIEVE that a 1028 (vehicle registration check) was run on the car so the info must have been given to me by the man in the car. I only would have talked to the man behind the wheel and not to the other man on the passenger's side. All I can remember about the man on the passenger side is that he was not as well dressed as the man on the driver's side. I CAN'T REMEMBER ABOUT HIM because I would not have been interested in him at all unless the driver did not check out. On the day that the Cadillac was here I DON'T REMEMBER anything about the registration lines that day. I knew ESTES [sic] MORGAN, but I CAN'T REMEMBER seeing him in the registration line at a particular time. PALMER told me about him coming up to the Registrar's office, but I CAN'T REMEMBER exactly when. I had no set time to get there or leave so I CAN'T REMEMBER remember exactly when the Cadillac came to my attention. I feel like it was before dinner and it was the first time I had seen HENRY EARL that day.

    QUESTION BY MR. SCIAMBRA:

    Mr. MANCHESTER, Lieutenant Fruge and I have talked to HENRY EARL PALMER and HENRY EARL has told us that he feels that on that particular day, after the Cadillac was called to his attention, he told you to get a 1028 on the Cadillac and he went into the coffee shop for coffee. He feels that about 10 minutes later he came out of the coffee shop and that you told him "Don't worry about the Cadillac. They are not from the Justice Department, they are from the International Trade Mart in New Orleans." He then asked you what were they doing up here and you said they were selling bananas.

    ANSWER BY MR. MANCHESTER:I feel that HENRY EARL's account of what happened is exactly what happened but it was a long time ago.If I would have called for a 1028 in [sic] the car, I would have had to get it over my radio and from the best I can remember I would not have been sitting in my car in the hot sun. A radio check on a car can take anywhere from 2 minutes to 24 hours and you can never tell how fast you could get one back.
    I was asked to hang around the Registrar's Office as much as possible during the demonstrations and I was around there a lot during that time. I DON'T REMEMBER seeing the car leave or anyone going around the car.

    Diego Verdegiglio
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 12
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 28/07/2007 16:02
    Questa è la testimonianza al processo contro Clay Shaw. Anche in tribunale Manchester identificherà l'imputato come colui che aveva visto a Clinton.
    ___________________________________________________________________

    The Clay Shaw trial testimony of John Manchester

    JOHN MANCHESTER, a witness called by and on behalf of the State, having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows:

    DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. SCIAMBRA:

    Q: Please state your name for the record.

    A: John Manchester.

    Q: What is your address, Mr. Manchester?

    A: Box 42, Clinton, Louisiana.

    Q: And how long have you been living there?

    A: Since 1962.

    Q: And what is your occupation?

    A: Town Marshal, Clinton, Louisiana.

    Q: And how long have you been a Town Marshal in Clinton, Louisiana?

    A: Since that time.

    Q: You were so employed in 1963?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: In connection with your duties as Town Marshal, I call your attention to late August or early September, 1963, and ask you if anything unusual was happening in Clinton at that time?

    A: Yes, sir. We had a voter registration drive going on there at that time.

    Q: I am sorry. Who was sponsoring that voter registration drive?

    A: Congress of Racial Equality.

    THE COURT: Who is that?

    THE WITNESS: CORE.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: Was that all during the summer of 1963?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: Will you speak a little louder, please, sir.

    A: Yes.

    Q: In connection with the voter registration drive going on, what were your duties around Clinton at that time?

    A: Just to maintain law and order and to try to keep out the outside agitation that was attempting to infiltrate.

    THE COURT: Speak into the microphone.

    A: (Continuing) Just keep law and order, maintain law and order.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: Were there many people in town for this voter registration drive?

    A: They had quite a few outsiders coming in, yes, sir.

    Q: Were you the only law enforcement agent on duty at the time?

    A: No, sir, we had other law enforcement but it was -- I was the primary law enforcement officer to take care of this special operation.

    Q: Besides local law enforcement agents, were there any other law enforcement agents in town?

    A: Yes, sir, the FBI was there.

    Q: What was the purpose of the FBI?

    A: Well, I don't really know their purpose there other than just observing.

    Q: Were you assigned to any particular location during this drive?

    A: Yes, sir, I was assigned to the immediate vicinity of the Registrar of Voters' office to keep down any disturbances that might result from this voter registration drive going on.

    Q: Now, where is the voter registration office located in Clinton, Louisiana?

    A: It is on St. Helena Street in Clinton.

    Q: Is that the main street?

    A: That is the main street, it is the main highway going through Clinton.

    Q: And this is where you spent most of your time?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: Were there many strange cars in town that day, or cars that weren't familiar to you?

    A: Yes, sir, there was a few strange cars, and if they were strange I would know them. I mean the town is small enough that I kept trying to keep up with all strange automobiles in that vicinity.

    Q: Did you notice any strange car in particular that day in connection with where you were stationed?

    A: Yes, sir, I did.

    Q: Could you describe that car?

    A: Yes, sir. It was a '61 or '62 Cadillac somewhere, I guess this model. It was black and it was parked in the vicinity of the Registrar's Office.

    MR. SCIAMBRA: The State will mark this photograph "S-2" for purposes of identification. (Whereupon, the photograph referred to by Counsel was duly marked for identification as "State Exhibit No. 2.")

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: (Exhibiting photograph to witness) I ask you if you recognize the automobile in that picture.

    A: Yes, sir. That is either the automobile or one just exactly like it.

    Q: Approximately how far from the Registrar's Office was this automobile parked?

    A: You want that in feet?

    Q: Well, just an estimate.

    A: I would say approximately 50 feet from the entrance to the Registrar's Office.

    Q: Can you remember how this car was called to your attention?

    A: Yes, sir, Mr. Palmer --

    MR. DYMOND: Now I object to anything another person stated, Your Honor.

    MR. SCIAMBRA: I didn't even ask --

    MR. ALCOCK: He didn't ask the question. How can you object?

    MR. DYMOND: He was about to testify.

    MR. ALCOCK: You can anticipate.

    THE COURT: When you make your objections, make them to me and let me rule.

    MR. DYMOND: I made the objection after the witness commenced testifying. If I don't make it then, I might as well not make it.

    THE COURT: I sustain your objection. I might suggest, Mr. Sciambra, if you change the form of the question to the effect, did he have a conversation with someone, he could say yes, but not what that person said.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: Did you have a conversation with anyone in regard to this automobile?

    A: Yes, sir, I did.

    THE COURT: That is as far as you can go.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: As a result of this conversation, did you do anything?

    A: Yes, sir, I checked this automobile out.

    Q: What do you mean you "checked it out"?

    A: I walked over and talked to the man that was behind the wheel of this car.

    Q: How many people did you see in the car?

    A: There was two men in it.

    Q: Were they in the front or the back seat?

    A: Both in the front seat.

    Q: Can you describe the individual on the passenger side?

    A: No, sir, I can't. Mister, I didn't talk to him.

    Q: Which one did you talk to?

    A: I talked to the driver.

    Q: The driver of the automobile?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: Can you describe the man behind the wheel of the automobile that you talked to?

    A: Yes, sir. He was a big man, gray-haired, ruddy complexion, a real easy-talking man.

    Q: Do you see the man in the courtroom today that you talked to?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: Would you point him out to us.

    (The witness complied.)

    THE COURT: I didn't see you. Well, answer by voice, because there is nothing going in the record.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: (Indicating) Is this the individual that you pointed to?

    A: Yes, sir.

    MR. SCIAMBRA: Will the record please reflect the witness pointed to the Defendant before the bar, Clay Shaw.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: Would you tell the Court what you said to the Defendant and what the Defendant said to you at that time.

    A: I can't remember exactly the words that I used to get this man's identification. I approached him like I do anyone that I am -- I want to find out the identity of them and I ask them where they are from or what their name is.

    Q: When you asked this individual where he was from, did he say anything?

    A: He said he was a representative of the International Trade Mart in New Orleans.


    Q: Did you ever talk to anyone from the International Trade Mart before this day?

    A: No, sir, I hadn't.

    Q: Was that all the conversation you had with this gentleman?

    A: That was enough to satisfy me that he wasn't concerned with this.

    MR. DYMOND: I object to what satisfied the witness, Your Honor.

    THE COURT: Well, I think in his role as the Town Marshal, the purpose of him questioning, however he questioned, I think he can state as the Town Marshal that he was satisfied with the answer.

    MR. DYMOND: If the Court please, I submit he can say he felt he had asked enough questions, but to give his opinion or his impression as to the result of these questions is not within the scope of this witness's purpose on the stand.

    MR. ALCOCK: Your Honor, the testimony of the witness was to the effect that he approached this car to ask his identity or his reason for being in town because of the situation that prevailed at the time. The answer in response is perfectly logical.

    THE COURT: I will permit the answer, I think it is relevant to the Jury because of his peculiar position as Town Marshal. I may sustain, but as Town Marshal I think he can give the reason he stopped him for examination. I will permit it.

    MR. DYMOND: To which ruling we reserve a bill of exception, making the question, the answer, the objection, the Court's ruling thereon, and the entire record part of the bill.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: Do you remember the question?

    THE COURT: Repeat the question, or would you like to have it read? Read it back.

    (Whereupon, the pending question was read back by the Reporter.)

    THE COURT: And that is when you were interrupted. Would you like to continue your answer, Mr. Manchester?

    MR. DYMOND: I would like to make the answer part of the bill of exception, I want to make the answer part of the bill, too.

    THE COURT: Very well. Can you pick up where you left off?

    THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.

    A: (Continuing) On checking anybody from out of town at this particular time, I wouldn't spend any more time with any one individual than I had to to get an identification from him.

    BY MR. SCIAMBRA:
    Q: In other words, you were satisfied with the identification he gave you? Is that correct?

    A: That is right.

    Q: Now, after your conversation with him, did you have a conversation with anyone else in regard to the black Cadillac?

    A: Yes, sir.

    Q: Who was that conversation with?

    A: Mr. Palmer, Henry Earl Palmer.

    Q: What is his name?

    A: Henry E. Palmer, Registrar of Voters.

    Q: And what did you tell Mr. Palmer in relationship to the Cadillac and the individual in the Cadillac?

    A: I told Mr. Palmer that he didn't have anything to worry about the people in this Cadillac, that they was from International Trade Mart and they wasn't -- as far as I knew, it wasn't anything to do with this voter registration business.

    Q: Now, Mr. Manchester, did you see the Defendant Shaw's picture in the paper after he was arrested by this office?

    A: Yes, sir, I did.

    Q: Did you recognize him then?

    A: No, sir, I didn't pay that much (attention).

    Q: When did you recognize him?

    A: After he was -- after Mr. Shaw was charged, then I got to -- I got to putting the pieces together that I had seen this man before somewhere.

    Q: Did you tell anyone about this?

    A: Yes, sir, I talked to Mr. Palmer, I believe, about it.

    Q: Anyone else besides Mr. Palmer?

    A: Yes, sir, Lieutenant Francis Fruge, State Police.

    Q: Do you remember when this was?

    A: No, sir. It was some time after, a good while after he was arrested. I don't remember exactly how long it was.

    MR. SCIAMBRA: I tender the witness.
    ____________________________________________________________________

    Saluti
    Andrea

  • OFFLINE
    carmelo pugliatti
    Post: 1.261
    Registrato il: 17/12/2002
    Veterano
    00 29/07/2007 17:06
    Ci siamo già occupati della faccenda:
    carmelo pugliatti, 08/05/2007 03.37:

    No,non c'è nessuna prova del fatto.

    No; there is no credible evidence that Shaw knew Ferrie

    Tutti i presunti indizi sulla conoscenza Shaw-Ferrie vennero demoliti durante il processo scaturito dall'indagine di Garrison.Ad esempio

    The only other evidence of such a relationship consists of two 1949 photographs from a benefit party for New Orleans radio station WDSU, alleged to depict Clay Shaw and David Ferrie side by side. In the more famous of the two, "Ferrie" has been positively identified as WDSU broadcaster Robert Brannon, who died in 1962. He does indeed bear a striking resemblance to Ferrie, but not the Ferrie of 1949, who did not yet visibly suffer from alopecia, the disease that later caused the loss of his hair. The "Ferrie" figure in the second photograph has been identified as dentist J. Mofield Roberts, and does not bear any particular resemblance to Ferrie. (In 1949, Ferrie had not yet moved to New Orleans.

    Più grave il caso dei cosidetti "testimoni di Clinton" che avrebbero visto Shaw alla guida di una Cadillac nera insieme con Ferrie.Successive indagini rivelarono che la storia era stata inventata

    Author Patricia Lambert has unexpectedly discovered evidence that demolishes the Clinton witnesses' story. Lambert tracked down onetime Garrison investigator Anne Hundley Dischler, who had never been interviewed previously, and whose name seems to have been intentionally obscured by Garrison's office. Dischler still had the three stenographic pads of field notes she had accumulated during her brief tenure on the Clinton investigation in 1967. Her notes reveal the Clinton story to be a fabrication. http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100clinton.html


    Il "teorema" di Garrison verteva su un fantomatico complotto di omosessuali,di cui Shaw sarebbe stato il capo e Ferrie uno degli adepti.Secondo questa teoria anche Oswald e Ruby avrebbero fatto parte della congiura gay.Il movente? l'odio contro il virile Presidente http://freeforumzone.leonardo.it/viewmessaggi.aspx?f=11393&idd=501 Ecco alcuni link (in Inglese) su Clay Shaw e David Ferrie http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100whoshaw.html http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100whoferrie.html




    carmelo pugliatti
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 13
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 29/07/2007 18:10
    Come al solito, signor Pugliatti, di fronte alla verità della documentazione ufficiale, le sue argomentazioni sono, mi permetta, impresentabili.
    Di quali indagini parla, scusi?
    Di quelle di Patricia Lambert?
    Lasci perdere signor Pugliatti, e quando non sa cosa rispondere, non risponda. Farà meno favori alla causa complottista.
    Buone vacanze anche a Lei.
    Andrea

  • OFFLINE
    carmelo pugliatti
    Post: 1.267
    Registrato il: 17/12/2002
    Veterano
    00 29/07/2007 19:10
    andrea.morse, 29/07/2007 18.10:

    Come al solito, signor Pugliatti, di fronte alla verità della documentazione ufficiale, le sue argomentazioni sono, mi permetta, impresentabili.
    Di quali indagini parla, scusi?
    Di quelle di Patricia Lambert?
    Lasci perdere signor Pugliatti, e quando non sa cosa rispondere, non risponda. Farà meno favori alla causa complottista.
    Buone vacanze anche a Lei.
    Andrea


    Caro Signor Andrea,temo di non essere d'accordo con le sue valutazioni.Una falsa testimonianza è "documentazione ufficiale"? il farlo rilevare è un "argomentazione impresentabile"? Tutti coloro che non le danno ragione dovrebbero tacere? Ci rifletterò nelle lunghe sere d'estate.Quanto al non rispondere,temo di non poterla accontentare neanche in questo. La ringrazio per la sua attenzione e ricambio di tutto cuore l'augurio di buone vacanze.
    carmelo pugliatti
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 14
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 29/07/2007 20:08

    Sull'affidabilità di Patricia Lambert sarà utile leggere qui
  • OFFLINE
    carmelo pugliatti
    Post: 1.270
    Registrato il: 17/12/2002
    Veterano
    00 29/07/2007 20:27
    Utilissimo.Il sito è ,nel suo genere,molto interessante ed istruttivo.Complottismo da manuale.Naturalmente tutti coloro che non avvalorano il complotto sono come minimo "poco affidabili"."Probe,The truth is here",ovvio.
    carmelo pugliatti
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 15
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 29/07/2007 22:45
    No, signor Pugliatti, non considero inaffidabili coloro che sostengono la teoria ufficiale, ma la teoria ufficiale stessa.
    Se poi Lei, per controbattere alla testimonianza in tribunale di uno sceriffo, mi tira fuori Patricia Lambert, e gli oscuri e disonesti personaggi del suo libro che cercarono di distruggere l'inchiesta di Garrison, allora non deve meravigliarsi se non riesce ad apparirmi meritevole di credibilità.
    Sarebbe legittimo attaccare i sostenitori della cospirazione, se lo si facesse con argomentazioni degne di attendibilità.
    Saluti
    Andrea
  • OFFLINE
    Diego Verdegiglio
    Post: 1.329
    Registrato il: 18/11/2002
    Veterano
    00 29/07/2007 22:54
    Sull'assoluta inaffidabilità delle testimonianze Manchester-Palmer si vedano James Kirkwood, "American Grotesque", Harper Perennial, N.Y., 1968, 1970 (nell'edizione 1992 alle pagine214-215, 221-223) e il sito http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100clinton.html. Nel settembre 1963 il complotto per uccidere Kennedy, secondo chi ci crede, doveva essere già in atto: Ferrie e Shaw stavano "coltivando" il capro espiatorio Oswald da utilizzare in un attentato durante l'inizio della campagna elettorale di JFK nel Sud. I tre si riuniscono segretamente e giungono agli appuntamenti separatamente per non dare nell'occhio (con Ferrie dall'aspetto tanto particolare)? Approfittano di bui scantinati, panchine nei parchi, retrobottega di nightclub mafiosi, toilettes pubbliche per scambiarsi rapidi messaggi, magari mentre chiedono un accendino per la sigaretta? Neanche per sogno: i tre vanno in gita insieme in una vistosa e lussuosa Cadillac nera nella polverosa cittadina di Clinton, sede di tensioni razziali contro gli attivisti antisegregazionisti che spingono i negri ad iscriversi nelle liste elettorali. Si fanno vedere insieme, anzi Oswald si mette in fila con un gruppo di negri e Shaw fa identificare l'auto come appartenente all'International Trade Mart. Cioè come a dire: "Guardateci bene: siamo uno dei magnati più famosi di New Orleans, uno strano tipo alopecico totale con parrucca rossa e sopracciglia finte e un ex marine ventiquattrenne stempiato in cerca di lavoro nell'ospedale di Jackson. Ricordatevi quest'ultimo: lo vedrete sui giornali del 22 e del 23 novembre 1963". Il tossicodipendente Vernon W. Bundy aggiunge che, sulle rive del lago Pontchartrain (!!!), nella zona di New Orleans, il notissimo eminente cittadino Clay Shaw passa in pubblico un pacco di soldi ad un giovanotto magro e stempiato ("Ma sì, è proprio lui! Quello che ha poi sparato al Presidente!") e durante l'azione cadono in terra dalla tasca del giovanotto dei manifestini del Fair Play for Cuba Committee... Pensate che l'idiozia del mandante del più grande delitto del secolo sia finita qui? Ma neanche per sogno: durante una festa, davanti ad estranei, il riconoscibilissimo Ferrie dice a Shaw e ad un certo "Leon" Oswald che il Presidente sarà ucciso da un cecchino durante la sua visita a Dallas. Può bastarvi? Ma no: mancano le prove fotografiche. In una foto fatta durante una festa in maschera chi troviamo in atteggiamenti gioviali? Ma certo: sembrano proprio loro (ma non sono...), Shaw e Ferrie con parrucche di lamè!!! E come dubitare poi che Ferrie sia dietro al gesto di Oswald? Tutti sanno che era il suo istruttore della Pattuglia Aerea quando era adolescente, c'è una foto. Più prova di così... L'HSCA prese una "toppata" clamorosa (tutti possono sbagliare: nessuno è perfetto) simile a quella della "prova acustica" che indicava un "quarto sparo" dal poggio erboso: fu "incline a credere" che Ferrie e Oswald fossero stati davvero a Clinton, cosa poi smentita dall'analisi della credibilità dei testimoni. Molti anni fa facevo l'insegnante: ho una foto-ricordo con quattro miei allievi diciottenni. Uno di essi, purtroppo (e lo dico con grande dolore per la sua sorte), abbracciò l'ideologia delle BR e finì molto male. Come molti cittadini, qualche volta mi sono espresso bipartisan molto duramente nei confronti del Potere, dei privilegi e delle immunità della "casta" politica che ci governa, ma non più di questo: chi troverà un domani quella foto potrà invece imbastire un ottimo teorema: "Con un insegnante rivoluzionario, quel ragazzo non poteva che finire così, con un'arma in mano". Sic transit non gloria, sed HISTORIA mundi...
    Diego Verdegiglio
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 16
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 30/07/2007 11:06
    Io ho riportato la testimonianza, sotto giuramento, di un rappresentante della legge. E non era l'unica possibile.
    Kirkwood, del cui libro vale lo stesso discorso fatto per la Lambert, non mi risulta abbia deposto sotto giuramento in un tribunale degli Stati Uniti.
    Molto spesso Lei si è preoccupato delle fonti altrui, come ad esempio per i falliti test con il Carcano (a quel messaggio non ha risposto), e adesso ritiene Kirkwood una fonte attendibile.
    Credo che la coerenza sia una gran dote, ma proprio per questo molto rara.
    [Modificato da andrea.morse 30/07/2007 11:18]
  • OFFLINE
    !presidente!
    Post: 425
    Registrato il: 27/05/2005
    Veterano
    00 30/07/2007 18:50
    Vabbè...allora dovremmo credere che Clay Shaw ha delegato Oswald per andare a sparare a Kennedy...continuo a nn capire cosa c'entri l'op. mangusta con i fatti di Dallas....
  • OFFLINE
    andrea.morse
    Post: 17
    Registrato il: 20/07/2007
    Novizio
    00 30/07/2007 19:11
    Calma President,
    Shaw non ha mandato Oswald da nessuna parte, e nemmeno Garrison si è mai sognato di affermare una cosa del genere.
    Il compito di Shaw, Banister e Ferrie, se non fu quello di veri e propri ideatori dell'attentato, potrebbe essere stato quello di manipolare Oswald per farne un capro espiatorio.
    Comunque, qui si stava discutendo del fatto che Oswald avesse rapporti con quei personaggi. E dalla documentazione ufficiale, in particolare quella dell'HSCA, emerge che questi rapporti esistevano.
    E se questi rapporti non erano così significativi, perchè tanto impegno a volerli negare?
  • OFFLINE
    Federico Ferrero
    Post: 774
    Registrato il: 17/11/2002
    Veterano
    00 31/07/2007 00:00
    Vorrei ricordare che il 26 settembre 1963 la Casa Bianca annunciò che Kennedy avrebbe visitato Dallas.
    Chi risale nei mesi (Garrison addirittura negli anni!) non tiene minimamente conto della semplice circostanza che qualche settimana prima della visita il Tour elettorale di JFK era ancora in stato embrionale. Non si sapeva dove né quando Kennedy sarebbe passato.

    Sul valore dell'episodio di Clinton mi pare che strida a tal punto con un'ipotesi di complotto ai massimi livelli da sfiorare la caricatura: a Clinton arriva una Cadillac e un uomo d'affari si incontra a cielo aperto con due persone tra le più improbabili che si possano pensare per l'assassinio del secolo: un ex marine spostato e spiantato e un pazzoide estremista di destra dalla vita sregolata e torbida.
    Questa è un'opinione, per carità. Ma fa a tal punto a pugni col buon senso che non saprei proprio cosa dire.
    Federico Ferrero
2